Comments on: Earthship Design Principles

By: sm6wet

sm6wet — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:32:07 +0000

Tireshops pay lots of money to have trucks picking up used tires. So some of the Earthship builders actually get paid to take care of the tires.

By: red67box

red67box — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:19:58 +0000

Lemme guess. you listen to the Fox News Channel

By: johan404

johan404 — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:12:57 +0000

No. I don’t watch TV, too many lies come from that box,.

By: thesynista

thesynista — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:05:13 +0000

It’s meant to be challenged by competent people, ie scientists who know what they’re talking about.

Are you a scientist?

By: KOPYMEH

KOPYMEH — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:01:13 +0000

Who decides who is “competent” enough to have an opinion? You? I don’t think so.

I’m not a scientist but I’ve done my research.

By: terpis

terpis — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:59:21 +0000

what an exotic breed of idiot you sound like…ah..of course!

There’s the telltale Alex Jones ‘favorite’.

Global warming is a distraction, but any other right wing crackpot fever dream is very serious stuff.

“Political tool” indeed. Shut yr ass, poser.

By: johan404

johan404 — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:49:33 +0000

You have no way to refute what I say so you resort to name calling. Classic uneducated Al Gorean simpleton response, couldn’t have expected anything else.

Did you know your God Al Gore has made over $5 billion, with his co-founder Goldman Sachs banker buddie David Blood, from scamming global warming suckers like you?

Also, what Alex Jones talks about has nothing to do with right wing or left wing politics.

Go fight your windmills, Don Quixote. Continue the ignorance. Peace.

By: w8fh33dkajlfe99faaa

w8fh33dkajlfe99faaa — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:45:33 +0000

wow cooooool!

By: FlatfootJohnny

FlatfootJohnny — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:09:26 +0000

Im not sure why people get so het up against green tech. Surley if its cleaner then its better. Why are so many happy to breath in pollution, poison rivers, and thoughtlessly kill wildlife…not to mention starve developing nations. why be dependant on only 1 source of energy technology ie fossilised carbon. If the greenhouse effect is not happening then at least we get cleaner tech, being developed. If it is happening and we do nothing then we are buggered! oh yea we cant tax the sun and wind.

By: gecko303

gecko303 — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:07:12 +0000

Not sure where your based FlatfootJohnny….but you certainly can tax sunlight, it was tried in the UK in the 17th and 18th centuries. It was known as ‘window tax’. The more windows you had, the more you paid. Eventually people started bricking up their windows to avoid paying so much. As well as being a crime against architecture, it where the expression ‘daylight robbery’ stems from.